Prohibition, we know, has historically failed. Any situation in which an institution, a religion or a company has attempted to impose a principle, an ideal or a product not wanted by the people, sooner or later the force unleashed by the liberal and revolutionary mass for the reasons most useless meets the case and end up doing something good for once for herself. Teases the forbidden desire, repression incites the rush, and in less than no time rulers, priests, and entrepreneurs from around the world find themselves forced to change, smooth or replace the product, antisocial, and justify the appearance with clever marketing decisions perhaps exploiting the flaws of the past to revive the spirit innovative institution, the parish or the company on duty, ready again to (not) face the future but in a slightly different way from before. Citizens, believers and customers around the world, faced with an initial fulfillment as a dummy, I'm so tempted to continue to abide, suffer and pay, which enables new generations of powerful continue to exercise its power, pushing your luck and pursuing an unhealthy perfection in their ability to quell the people (the real source of their income) for as long as possible.
The most striking demonstration of the historical failure of prohibition is that most of the practices so far abandoned by society human was not a result of an explicit prohibition, but the arrival of an annoying and irritating inconvenience, that to survive the shame in front of their uncomfortable past is eventually masked by injustice. The moral force, slowly transformed to avoid embarrassing contradictions, it is only the task of endorsing the "official version" of events: a new generation, new values, new power. Unlike what happens in these spontaneous processes, but the laws are created directly by the organs of power for the sole purpose of controlling them. But next to it for good (or trying to anticipate the times, educating the mass of social behavior and advantageous from the perspective of evolutionary ritenuti poi normali a qualche decennio di distanza), vi è innegabilmente il fin di male, ossia quel tentativo di controllo non assoggettato al bene comune ma bensì agli interessi dei pochi, degli incompetenti, dei falsi e degli ipocriti. Una gabbia nella quale difficilmente gli interessi della massa rimarranno trattenuti a lungo.
Nella cronaca recente, ci sono diversi esempi di proibizionismo inefficace: la pillola abortiva RU-486, la criminalizzazione della droga, la criminalizzazione dell’eutanasia. Tanti esempi nei quali la liberalizzazione , vista dagli organi di controllo come un’insensata distruzione dei valori secolari di cui si fanno orgogliosi portatori (una forma di mantenimento del potere), è instead be considered the only real solution to the problem. When something is forbidden, the reason is shunned by the hopelessly sentimental, but when everything is allowed, the reasoning was free to choose the moral questioning and at the same time helping to improve it. It is in this view of things that you should enter the educational role of society, schools, religious authorities if you want, and any other source of values. L 'education must create free citizens who do not need irrational constraints on their intelligence, but who know how to discern right and wrong, who can refuse without demonizing peacefully, people who use short con consapevolezza il libero arbitrio come vera fonte di progresso e di cultura . In questo modo, la morale si forgia cavalcando i secoli, senza rimanere bloccata su inutili pregiudizi ideologici, dando così vita ad esseri umani sempre migliori che, di conseguenza, avranno sempre meno bisogno di leggi, dogmi, divinità invisibili... e avranno anche sempre meno a che fare con prodotti scadenti: una simpatica conseguenza della similarità concettuale che, sotto sotto, esiste tra un banale prodotto industriale, Dio (prodotto primo dell’umana paura della morte) e una legge (prodotto primo dell’umana paura del caos).
0 comments:
Post a Comment