My Dog Anus Turning Black

On corruption, the culture and the distortion of the facts

E 'widespread view among those shoes splashing in the sea of \u200b\u200btheir own and others' opinions, that a real truth underneath there, and that at most he can find a substitute or a discreet mediation on facts and opinions. This distorted vision on the whole of a fact (which is the presence of truth) is to be extremely beneficial, both for those who desire to maintain unchanged the current state of things (hence the hegemony of power to its holder) and for those points to divert the attention of those who have the skills to drag the ethical dilemma (and therefore potentially the solution) on the agenda in società e nella cultura.

Il mantenimento del potere , come ben sappiamo, è oggi più che mai semplice da ottenere. La propaganda mediatica, in un’era in cui la tecnologia dà possibilità senza sforzo e a buon mercato di toccare ogni angolo del pianeta in pochi istanti, permette non solo al potere di autodefinirsi tale con sufficiente credibilità, ma anche di instillare nel popolo il falso sentore di normalità e accondiscendenza nei confronti dello stesso, che si traduce (nelle democratiche sedi di voto) in una scelta compiacente e partecipe di appoggio ad un determinato sistema di potere, anche quando alla luce dei fatti non conviene. A questo, si aggiunge poi la naturale human propensity to identify in a pack, a concept from one era to appropriately renamed to keep abreast of the times (party, brand, sports team, ...).

Despite the simple method of dissemination of consensus, the maintenance of power is an exasperating that worn deep in the fabric of society, not only for activities that drain energy, but also - and perhaps especially - all the social habits that promotes. In fact, the power holders and their allies (active or passive accomplices) you acknowledge and reinforce one another in practices which, taken together, can be enclosed under the single definition of corruption. Corruption undermines the trust, justice and efficiency, erodes common sense and fair play, and brings inconvenience to those who hinder the honesty and honor those who blatantly favors if n'adegua, with a slow but overwhelming force capable of destroying any social superstructure, even empires. So not only is a carrier of costly tax evasion and illegal abuses, but it is also a very bad moral conduct for themselves and their children. Corruption also reached the summits of power before any other vice or virtue, and tends (like a virus) to promote herself trying to decriminalize the eyes of society and the law. The liberalization of the illegality and the legitimacy of the culture of corruption, common priorities of the governing bodies subversive, is a clear indication of a dangerous trend that could lead to catastrophic consequences for the future of society itself.

The only way to change things and then the search for truth that, as a disturbing factor in a state of idyllic balance of power between characters, is the basis for providing evidence to deductive logic the benefit. In other words, the objective analysis of the facts, reduced by any personal bias, inevitably leads to a solution of the problem appears to be in one way or another, the more right or the most advantageous (depending on the context). E 'for this that often such research is hindered energetically dominant oligarchy, which earns money (and power) from its social imbalance and injustice related to the lack of analysis and objective solutions: it can exist in this oligarchy' only social ecosystem by feeding on an uneven global situation, the energy foundation of its power.

I can not, in my heart, who puts his own interests to defend the common good. Not so much a moral issue (which is indeed peremptory), as a matter of evolution. They, In fact, reason being contingent on ignoring the damage that their careless behavior refers also on their children and their future. However I can not, for similar reasons after all, to blame the behavior, especially when they profess to carry aware of a corrupt and inconsistent set of values: in the end, mechanically-operated in their interest, in a situation where the maximization of its profit is perceived as the best thing to do. But I am unable to blame those who suffer from this situation, lifeless, and then sedated hordes of people who not only have the will to rise to a situation clearly inappropriate (for themselves and their children), but even come to share, in defiance of the laws of logic, evidence of facts and his own personal dignity. Establish an environment short of collective madness in which the facts and knowledge is denigrated, and (the deduction) truth publicly defamed, the human tendency to flock to make the glue between a large group of fools unable to accept it.

The course draws strength from the collective delusion ' ignorance, not only by passive acquiescence, as an inexhaustible source of the absence of rational criticism and revision. For this reason, the ' education is one of the most sought after prey from power. Poor or even better inaccurate statement makes it possible to train individuals in power biased, trained to defend the principles and justify the methods, so good mostly because his work of promoting socially credible. By criticizing the critical intellectual independence, education is not corrupt as free citizens but customers are accustomed to a product, unable to find and evaluate alternatives. It is therefore a form of cultural monopoly, whose lack of competition precludes the development and improvement of the state of things. The main purpose of education then, that the impoundment of mediocrity, is shot down, and with it the quality of culture and opportunities for participation politics of the people who will be so easily manipulated by a corrupt power.

In an age that measures the quality of freedom from the amount of information transferred, the amount of words spoken and the number of votes obtained, we can not therefore surprising that some of the most concrete form of political participation and is formalized in the moral debate . The adventurous and willing to be found so in the public square (virtual or physical that is) to fight this modern (and limited) transpose the usual struggle between good and evil, thus bringing the lounges, bars and online communities to be filled with partisan inconsistent that, in their small, they claim to be right for various reasons, with the exception of the one who should move their consciences, that is - exactly - the search for truth. Each side presents its view antagonist in the debate, and in an instant the whole square reacts admired or disgusted, interested or bored, for an engaging (as empathic contents) theater without winners or losers, without any targets or results , in which power is democratically again managed to obfuscate the truth. The facts give way to views, the consequences give way to theories or conspiracies, and he leads a game that revolves more around the truth, but around the protagonists . For this reason, the search for truth is set aside, more democratically, trying to get a surrogate for his persuasive opinions, views from this angle that lose all their flavor genuine liberal than once.

This debate, regardless of how it will end, it has been a hit for power and a defeat for the truth and culture, since no debate of this kind can never lead to truth. The assumptions are wrong, opinions irrelevant (if not supported by facts), the context for re-interpreted to favor a competitor or the other, le credenze create a tavolino da abili campagne di propaganda mediatica, e i fatti lasciati in secondo piano senza che gli antagonisti sentano l’esigenza di interpellarli per dare credito alle proprie argomentazioni al di là della dialettica convincente. Manca umiltà, onestà, intelligenza e senso della critica, manca cultura e senso del futuro, manca uno scopo morale. L’indagine maieutica (ossia la possibilità di discernere la vera conoscenza dalle opinioni soggettive tramite il dialogo) risulta essere insomma fallimentare: la menzogna prevale perché lo scopo del dibattito non è la ricerca della verità ma la ricerca della vittoria .

Ed è ora di capire that winning does not mean they're right.

Vw Front Suspension Blueprints

criminal mind

I'm talking about the death penalty. So, just to brighten your evening.

Over the centuries the sense of justice and good taste for ethics have evolved, but they have not done the same methods to punish offenders. Changing names ( rehabilitation, correction ,...), even barbaric practices are eliminated, such as torture, but the concepts are always the same: isolation, seclusion, occasionally death, demonstrating the fact that the man and human civilization can reach the moon but you can not bear and a master criminal mind (even when the crime was the result of despair, not of evil). The only weapon that civilized man has at its disposal to fight crime is the moral : an idea is indeed contradictory, and most hackneyed fight crime with crime. Morality, however, can not morally fight and resolve an amoral act, unless exceptions applying to itself (in the same way a chess player can not beat someone who does not adhere to the rules): The penalty for those who kill or rape involves pain, deprivation or death to the same penalties imposed by the criminal to his victim. In short, modern society is accepted amoral behavior when they are turned to crime, legalized by that common sense of Justice, which - as mentioned at the beginning - changes and evolves over time according to custom and existing companies. But the moral theory should not justify amoral behavior, though seemingly natural, legitimate or justifiable, given that such exceptions will enshrine inefficiency, relativity, the uncertainty of whether it is in fact a bad publicity for posterity ...

The prison is a temporary patch, but it does nothing but try to limit the damage, not solving the problem at its root (which is the culture crime ). As a temporary patch, the prison door, brings a set of unavoidable collateral problems, dilemmas ethics that arise from defects in the original solution has the ethical point of view: the segregation of prisoners as a restriction of individual freedom, and violence in prisons as a safety valve for the inevitable stress and deprivation, the possible exploitation of labor of prisoners, the death penalty itself as the ultimate court of guilt and effective deterrent and elegant solution to the problem of overcrowded prisons. Structural defects that can only be filled by other exceptions, from other documents, in combinatorial explosion of additional grounds for further problems.

This method does not work then it is ripe to act on humans, which is unlikely species may change if born and raised in a society that - as a real cause of crime - has led him where he is now. E 'therefore necessary to change society itself, and society will not only change with the laws and taxes, but mainly thanks to a revolutionary movement: an epochal rift between the new generation (a carrier of a persuasive alternative to the present) and old, with her frantic need for repression and (self-) preservation. And what better place if not the revolutionary decision to remove the children unfit parents? Come on, children deserve to be able to recognize the mistakes of their parents deserve to have the opportunity to break the vicious circle of power that binds them to their origins ( "Being the son of someone does not mean everything dovergli" , Alexander Berger). And, mind you I do not speak of having to be exemplary parents to raise a child (which, indeed, may be even harmful) but at least they are not unaware of the unfortunate and dangerous for the future and his humanity. Why They're not to encourage the adoption of practices that encourage independence and ideals of education of new generations, removing children from dangerous or unsuitable for families (as can be wealthy or not) to grow a citizen of the future? It 'clear that evolution requires a hard del proprio concetto di proprietà in quanto genitori, rendendosi perciò umilmente conto che il bambino non appartiene a se stessi ma è un patrimonio comune dell’intera umanità... ma pensate quanto sarebbe facile, tramite questi accorgimenti sociali nelle modalità di educazione dei figli, far passar di moda l’abitudine alla criminalità!

...Ovviamente, innumerevoli film hanno col tempo mostrato innumerevoli modi in cui le cose possono andare male (o molto male) in un sistema di questo genere. Ogni volta che si inserisce l'imperfetto controllo umano in un processo evolutivo, si toglie quell'imprevedibilità che permette alla natura di sistemare i problemi nel corso dei secoli, raggiungendo inaspettate situazioni di equilibrio (e quindi di progresso) anche dalle ipotesi più pessimistiche. Per cui è molto più probabile che l’umanità sia destinata a rimaner confinata nella sua solita secolare lentezza evolutiva, cadenzata dalla tradizione e dall’insensato incedere degli errori, tramandati alle future generazioni come patrimonio doveroso da preservare in nome di un inutile passato.

Walk In Pediatric Clinic Toronto

28 years

Il fatto di diventare padri e madri, nella società filocattolica in cui sono cresciuto e in cui tuttora risiedo, ha dei connotati quantomeno perversi. Così come, infatti, si esorta il fedele al perdono, alla carità, alla tolleranza and faith in Christ (obviously distorted the values \u200b\u200bneed not to disfigure the face of people who really exist, unlike the good God), so urging the faithful to procreation (of course, always and only after marriage), the value the family as a gift of God and the Christian duty to educate their children, of course, with Christian values. In these religious traditions, apparently far more visceral then alongside human social traditions: the cult of the offspring, the sense of inheritance after death, the blood to pass from father to son.

comment on the apparent senselessness of the religious traditions would be overly redundant. Every religious ideal that has a little to do with reality, as you should well know, is nothing but a disguise primordial needs of those who, deep down, do not place anywhere else than on the human sense of fear of anything connected to his death. Yes, of course, then stuffed all the details, rituals and ideologies of power required to mantener himself, but for a moment, disregarding the political and economic history of religion and focus on the human, the farmer or hunter who is in each one of us, what emerges from all this that we call religion is nothing but fear of death, to defeat the god to whom we entrust imaginative that they can garantirci il prosieguo ad infinitum della nostra esistenza. Se agli sproloqui religiosi poi aggiungiamo pure il solito vecchio campanilismo familiare, inutile ad ogni livello di potere dal punto di vista evoluzionistico, otteniamo quel quadro delirante che in ogni epoca storica ha prodotto una quantità inaudita di disastri.

Io non sono qui a criticare il bisogno istintivo del ricordo post-mortem, sia dal punto di vista religioso che sociale (casomai ne critico le conseguenze quando sfociano in guerre, intolleranza, bigottismo, corruzione, faziosità e ingiustizie). Io sono qui a criticare la strumentalizzazione di questo bisogno, che tipicamente reinterpreta in un contesto di folle irrazionalità un gesto altrimenti così splendidamente natural (and rational) as procreation. And the rationality of procreation, as say the religious authority or social delirium that is usually given greater resonance, it has nothing to do with the divine, with the value of the family or the lineage, but - much more simply - with the very future of humanity.

The fact of becoming fathers and mothers in other words, once reduced by the nonsense of the ritual, at the end of the fair is nothing but the natural consequence of our experience of life, an awareness driven by an instinctive need, and no doubt a choice that requires the utmost clarity and responsibility. If we consider the matter da un punto di vista strettamente logistico, un figlio va innanzitutto mantenuto: servono insomma soldi, una casa, buone prospettive di futuro. Se invece valutiamo la faccenda da un punto di vista strettamente morale, serve la convinzione interiore (stagionata dall'età) di avere qualcosa di buono e di saggio da insegnargli. I nostri figli sono semplicemente il nostro lascito nel mondo, e in ultima analisi il vero senso di quell'eternità tanto sbandierata dalle autorità religiose, nonché l'unico vero modo di vivere per sempre. Ed è questo il motivo per cui la decisione di avere un figlio deve essere ponderata più di ogni altra. Il figlio, in quanto propria eredità nel mondo di domani, deve proporre al mondo il meglio di noi stessi and everything we've learned, and must have the courage to reject everything that we were wrong, so that our mistakes can no longer harm anyone else after our death.

Here, in summary, the rational conclusion of a 28 year old in a family atmosphere. So clear and natural to amaze even myself.