Quando alcuni ideali o valori cadono per una semplice disabitudine ad essi e al mondo circostante (il fuoco, per esempio, idolo degli uomini fin tanto che non riuscirono a dominarlo e replicarlo) si parla volentieri di progresso , per mitigare la vergogna nei confronti dei propri avi... a bit 'as those who blushing with embarrassing anecdotes that her mother, ignoring the social image of her son, telling soles in public. When it is society itself that must change to allow the entry of new values, they cry more readily to the scandal, the annihilation of the pillars of the moral injustice of our times, the abandonment of evil traditions (habits of our ancestors ) ... a little 'how - this time - we remember with affection of their grandparents, wise and benevolent as bad and have instead been rincitrulliti live by (the famous post-mortem, the same as Elvis and Kurt Cobain), praising the virtues almost want to frame the past, so away, so longed for as uncomfortable and full of contradictions. Dancing on the words, the photographs and stories, he escapes to change, it is argued, and prosecution, leaving in his mind only the abstract definition of change itself (for personal culture) and little else. So you live
of inertia, waiting for some raving lunatic who has the ability, value, and the presumption of make history and change the tables, rocking the boat and settled habits, and so slowly ports companies to adapt to the new, silent, without hurting anyone, without being noticed ... Like a stitch, subtle, mitigated by sleep and the mother's loving caresses omniscient. So the same play again, perhaps even among the same people, year over year younger, but now different conditions. Same words, same fear. Same argument, different conclusions.
L ' inertia is historically a distinguishing factor of any society ruled by marketing and submission to the dominant power. The power exercised through the marketing (often ruthless as convincing), an addiction to the preservation of the current state of things, as full of flaws can be polished to an analysis of the facts. Therefore it is not favored the replacement of generations (at least of ideas and solutions) necessary to produce an evolution of the state of things. The inertia, however, is poor in the eyes of the mind as a convenient way of life, which avoids problems with wisdom erroneously judged superfluous to mistakenly focus on problems at all unfair. The result is a society so irresponsible, irrational and lacking a comprehensive view of the facts, which pays the price of salt jurisdiction. Individuals pursuing personal goals (as to "maximize their profits), which is why the paradigm of interaction appears to be the favorite competition, which naturally dense the characteristics typical of a society that, to maintain its balance of power and control over a mass of inert should reward the best individuals in this light. Most of solidarity and cooperation that we can expect is inevitably imbued with opportunism, and can be summarized with the concept of "business morality" (Robert Wright): individuals are interested in the welfare of others cynically only when they perceive a correlation with the well-being.
In a society like this, the democracy appears to be a total illusion of mass. Power is not on the shoulders of the people (aggregates) but is in the hands of the powerful, those that are more adjusted to injustice in the maximization of its profit. Democracy is the valium del popolo che, affidandosi all’importanza socialmente condivisa delle istituzioni sociali e di valori politici apparentemente liberali, assume di avere il potere di decidere davvero la struttura e gli equilibri della propria società. In realtà il popolo, essendo per la maggior parte inerte, non avrebbe neppure le abilità di base per condurre a termine una tale opera, e la democrazia percepita si riduce alla sola facoltà di scelta, limitata ad un insieme innocuo di opzioni: “La democrazia sono due lupi e un agnello che decidono cosa mangiare per cena” (Ben Franklin). Se si associa poi allo zuccherino democratico una forma di governo di tipo repubblicano, ossia un’oligarchia “proletaria” allargata a few hundred or thousand people, you get a pernicious complication of an already too complex in its hypocrisy. The power, though in fact still firmly in the hands of a few individuals and often hidden, it is doubly protected: one part is passively supported by the indifference of the population statistically mediocre and undeserving (ignorance is complicity) of the other offers and advertises bogus audit institutions to which the people, with ignorant and complicit will assign the social significance that they lack to be really effective at the people themselves. Although on paper this short form of government should decrease the possibility of error (It's much more likely that a single mistake instead of a full parliament), in fact leads to greater inefficiency of the system, and a multiplication of the dramatic possibilities of those in power to hide their misdeeds in the folds of institutions and 'information.
As you can see, the picture of humanity that emerges is rather disappointing, even without considering the barbaric tradition, the unstable geopolitical, idiotic wars and religious and cultural contradictions. However, despite the inevitable pessimism that should be achieved, a solution exists, even if complicated. And 'that is necessary that the people will pop up from its slumber situation intellectually and supported by a ruling class that finally understands and promotes the importance of this awakening. The people must come to claim possession of the real instruments of control of his government, while the government should impose on the people knowledge of these instruments. The critical words should be actively promoted by the government and have full freedom of expression, even when the power is going against the same government that has promoted. As the generations follow one another, the imposition of power from potentially damaging to the very authority that supports them and gained responsibility dal basso dei cittadini porterà inevitabilmente ad un miglioramento del governo stesso, in quando selezione (ed espressione) di una collettività sempre più cosciente di se stessa. La disciplina alla civiltà e la cultura del futuro diventeranno così sempre più fondamento dei governi e dei cittadini, e di fatto una conseguenza naturale dell’aumentata conoscenza, unico vero barlume divino su questa Terra. Successivamente, l’esigenza razionale all’efficienza, sorretta dalla cultura di massa, potrebbe addirittura portare alla costituzione di un governo centralizzato, una élite di illuminati al reale servizio di un popolo di individui che perseguono finalità sociali, in un paradigma di interazione questa volta votato alla collaborazione .
Collaborazione, democrazia, intelligenza. Sono fattori difficili da creare in un contesto altamente variabile come quello sociale. Sono valori che richiedono fatica individuale, responsabilità, notevoli capacità di previsione. Sono valori costosi, soprattutto in un’economia e in una società di mercato come quella attuale. Ma sono anche valori meravigliosamente umani, valori che riassumono il meglio dell’umanità stessa, e che paradossalmente in tutta la loro umanità conducono irrimediabilmente ad una meccanica efficienza . Ma una tale manifestazione di umana efficienza, altrettanto paradossalmente implementazione più realistica della divina perfezione, per achieve the success it deserves to be force to reckon with the 'ethical . As a mother concerned about the fate of humanity, must necessarily risking psychological imbalance mass that such a global situation would create a threat that the libertine spirit and often unaware of the individual would see as a collapse of their personal freedoms, a jump in the darkness of the Middle Ages, or simply an evolution uncomfortable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment