... not that machine learning or theoretical physics, perhaps, but it is complicated.
Talking about sex in public is certainly liberating , especially those who grew up on bread and Catholicism as me. If faced with the necessary knowledge and wisdom (the divine that mixture that comes only with age and intelligence), it is incredible to be a topic of discussion, because empathic attractive content, and - unlike music, religion , politics and so on - can unite rather than divide, stimulating in a masterly way that hint of humanity that we all feel when naked (mentally or physically, then in direct contact with ourselves beyond the social masks) or embarrassed. What most troubled the mind of others, in that circumstance, it is often the ease with which some seem to address the issue: libertinism, painting over the centuries as negative, and only recently out of fashion (although not everyone seems to have noticed) thanks to the "culture" on television, it is perceived as a lack of respect towards the partner (the other or oneself), and therefore inherently reprehensible. The basic error of this position is, however, fundamental, because a prelude to an incorrect definition of sex and love, with all the negative consequences of the case. Perhaps for this reason, this distinction, the subject of vast numbers of works of literature and film, has never appeared as it is in reality, that is extremely easy to delineate, and typical case of application of Occam's razor.
What has always been missing in this analysis is the awareness that 'love as human feeling, is a primary form of rationality . I am not speaking of cold mathematics of the mechanism or logic existential exasperation, I speak of the mental harmony with the understanding that every human being clearly react to what he loves. Love, the authentic one, is a natural deduction resulted from a state of perfect balance, one way or another, is established in the minds of those who love. No matter the person to whom it is directed (women, men, women, men, things, art, music, situations), what matters is the immediate awareness that triggers the subject's perception, that attraction visceral, although romantically called irrational, is as inevitable as it is the force of gravity, as well as any rational law of nature. Then love is accompanied by a host of other emotions, such as' possessiveness or jealousy : different definitions for different things that have essentially to do with priorities (physical and mental) are completely different. The priority is the beauty, the perception of perfection that is in the eye and artistic sense of the beholder. Instead, the priority of jealousy, as is in dell'ossessività 'selfishness in the sense of ill possession unconsciously by those who claim that he shares with us our life, in quell'ingiusta understatement that makes the ornament a partner, a servant, a subordinate. When in fact the way the perception of beauty is diverted by a claim to power , dall'egoistica need to overpower, dominate and win, we're not talking about love (rationally devoted to perfection) but control (irrationally devoted to power ). In
sex, as in love, there's a lot of rationality. Rational and the engine of the sexual experience is precisely that balance of roles, clearly admitted by both parties as they may seem extreme to the round of right-thinking (irrationally addicted to inculcategli preconceptions of social control). Roles that intersect and unite in a game that takes participants to a better experience of the body. Sure, the sex gets even more beneficial when it is an instrument of union of people who already love each other, thus making human participation in the fast lane of their beauty (imagine a dinner with a Van Gogh to Michelangelo), but this is after all only a way - though it is the best - to live it. Sex, in other words, if decontextualized from the situation in which love can be found commonly, Dionysus is a party game, where anyone can selfishly seek the best for themselves in a common purpose that, if rational, benefiting both as naturally exists. The Parties shall exchange such passions, secrets and pleasures, they test themselves, they experience unexpected ecstasy, seeking confirmations and denials, play live and find hidden feelings. Even here, therefore, if the rules are respected, ie if abuses do not occur on one side or the other (as I say, irrational forms of domination), the rationality of the natural experiment of his own body and instruct the existence prevail. Imagination and spontaneity is everything else, in a vast array of reports (for couples or multiple), mode and positions, arrangements and interactions, to start a game with a good wine (or a recioto past, perhaps accompanied by dark chocolate) and - possibly - be terminated with a amused contentment and good coffee.
This is how the eternal dilemma between sex and love can decay in a few moments where the prejudices are left in front of a conscious search for human rationality, one that straddles the centuries and habits, that can define things with their name and according to those beautiful flawless draw inferences, that uniquely human faculty that knows how to make love and sex summary of perfection in their imperfection, a synthesis of poetry in their normal synthesis of divinity in their humanity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment